The 16-core Intel Xeon W-3245-equipped model has recorded an overwhelming score of “14285”, and the results are unmatched. On the other hand, multi-core scores are as follows. It seems that single-core performance is not much better than the standard Intel Core i3-8100. Furthermore, the score of the 12-core Intel Xeon W-3235 model is '1090', and the score of the 8-core Intel Xeon W-3223 model is '1008'.
#Geekbench mac pro 12 core benchmark pro#
Mac Pro with a 16-core Intel Xeon W-3245 with a suggested retail price of $ 1999 (about 220,000 yen) is '1104'. In addition, Macs sold from 2017 to 2019 are lined up, and the latest Mac Pro is ranked 11th from the top. Geekbench scored the highest score as a benchmark result sent to Geekbench is the score of '1253' of the early 2019 model 27-inch iMac equipped with 8-core Intel Core i9-9900K. Mac Pro running benchmark tests with Geekbench 5 is a Mac Pro purchased by general users, so at the time of writing the benchmark result of 28 core Intel Xeon W-3175X, the most expensive processor that Mac Pro can load do not exist.īenchmark results are divided into single-core scores and multi-core scores. If the score is double, that is, “2000”, it means that it means “twice the performance of Intel Core i3-8100”.
Geekbench 5 sets Intel Core i3-8100 to the baseline score (1000) and measures performance based on whether the score is better than this. Geekbench, which has released Geekbench 5, has released the benchmark results of the monster-class Mac Pro with such price and specifications.īase and Middle Tier Mac Pro Models Offer Performance Similar to iMac Pro-MacRumors
In Japan, reservations started on December 11, 2019, depending on the configuration, `` Mac Pro '', which can exceed up to 5.7 million yen, seems to have already reached the hands of some users, so it is a basic benchmark at once It seems that there are a lot of users who are measuring performance with ' Geekbench 5 '.
14:00:00 'Mac Pro' benchmark results released, middle-range configuration equivalent to iMac Pro performance
0 kommentar(er)
